These results are available upon request. Lesbian mother families and gay father families in Italy: Family functioning, dyadic satisfaction, and child well-being. Thus, perhaps the same-sex couples in the sample might have had an increased likelihood of staying together had they been married — like the heterosexual couples in the sample.
The transition to adoptive parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, —
The family itself is a symbol. Nock suggested that there were seven dimensions of marriage: 1. Free essay samples Examples Marriage and Symbolic Interactionism. Conflict theorists find disputes over the division of household labor to be a common source of marital discord.
The one question that this survey did not answer is why respondants answered the way they did. Allowing gay couples to stand in Licenses and Attributions. The primary and most vocal opposition to homosexual marriage are religious conservatives.
T2: Child gender Child gender was included as a control as some research has found that heterosexual couples are less likely to divorce when they have sons Hetherington, Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Partner 1 and partner 2 are arbitrary when we have indistinguishable dyads—e.
Rostosky, S. Characteristics for the individual respondents and partners can be obtained from the authors. Children and Youth Services Review. In addition to aspects of the adopted child, aspects of the adoption process — including how much adoption- and parenting-related preparation the couple receives before adopting — may also contribute to individual and relational stress Goldberg, a.
LeBlanc, A. When it comes to sexuality, functionalists stress the importance of regulating sexual behavior to ensure marital cohesion and family stability.