Table 1 shows castration laws by state. Legislation in Georgia, Montana, Oregon, and Wisconsin provides for chemical castration only; California, Iowa, Florida, and Louisiana permit both chemical and surgical castration; and Texas allows only surgical castration. These researchers argue that since a weaker internal signal in the brain means a higher requirement for history of castration of sex offenders in Georgia stimulation to create a feedback loop that tires the brain circuits out as in orgasm and lead to satisfaction, a reduction of the internal stimulation from hormones would make the required external stimulation stronger and also more specific, as weaker signals involve narrower ranges of other brain functions in their loops.
Wiebe January Retrieved 23 September
They must order repeat offenders on parole to undergo such treatment before parole. Laws on Castration. Want an ad-free experience? Georgia An inmate may change his decision to undergo the procedure at any time before it is performed; however, he will be forever prohibited from having the procedure performed by the department.
Throughout, we assume, unless specified otherwise, that chemical castration is to be offered to currently incarcerated offenders or paroled offenders as an alternative or part of an alternative to further incarceration. We noted that, though our argument strengthens the case for offering chemical castration as an alternative to further incarceration in certain cases, the above-mentioned limitation also suggests a possible need to ensure that incarceration practices be reformed before this alternative is offered.
If prevailing history of castration of sex offenders in Georgia practices are not justified, then it may not be possible to take them as a baseline in the way that is required for our argument to succeed. Also seen is a sudden shrinking in bone mass and discoloration of the lips,   reduced body hair,  and muscle mass.
In some jurisdictions they are subjected to gruelling forced labour and may even have organs removed against their will Caplan et al. In others, refusal to undergo chemical castration can increase the likelihood of further incarceration though no formal link is made between the two. Though this might alleviate concerns regarding the validity of consent, there may be good reasons not to take this route.
However, orchiectomy cannot be a condition of probation or parole. Offenders are responsible for the costs of the evaluation, the treatment plan, and the treatment.